[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]



View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 1 from proof bwsiminv-implies-weakbwsim (conclusion) (back to tree)

≤BI(cioaut, aioaut) ⊦ ≤wB(cioaut, aioaut)

System applied rule normalize

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

Additional information

Proof step 2 from proof bwsiminv-implies-weakbwsim (previous step) (back to tree)

≤BI(cioaut, aioaut), ¬ ≤wB(cioaut, aioaut) ⊦

User applied rule constructor cut

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

var: cioaut

Additional information

Used simplifier rules: IOAutomaton('s, 'a, 'e) freely generated by IOAut;;

Proof step 3 from proof bwsiminv-implies-weakbwsim (previous step) (back to tree)

cioaut = IOAut(cstart, cstep, cext), ≤BI(cioaut, aioaut), ¬ ≤wB(cioaut, aioaut) ⊦

Heuristic simplifier applied rule simplifier

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

Additional information

Proof step 4 from proof bwsiminv-implies-weakbwsim (previous step) (back to tree)

≤BI(IOAut(cstart, cstep, cext), aioaut), ¬ ≤wB(IOAut(cstart, cstep, cext), aioaut) ⊦

User applied rule constructor cut

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

var: aioaut

Additional information

Used simplifier rules: IOAutomaton('s, 'a, 'e) freely generated by IOAut;;

Proof step 5 from proof bwsiminv-implies-weakbwsim (previous step) (back to tree)

aioaut = IOAut(astart, astep, aext), ≤BI(IOAut(cstart, cstep, cext), aioaut), ¬ ≤wB(IOAut(cstart, cstep, cext), aioaut) ⊦

Heuristic simplifier applied rule simplifier

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

Additional information

Proof step 6 from proof bwsiminv-implies-weakbwsim (previous step) (back to tree)

≤BI(IOAut(cstart, cstep, cext), IOAut(astart, astep, aext)), ¬ ≤wB(IOAut(cstart, cstep, cext), IOAut(astart, astep, aext)) ⊦

User applied rule apply rewrite lemma

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

spec: <toplevel>, name: backwardsiminv-def, seq: ⊦ ≤BI(cioaut, aioaut) ↔ (∃ t, aINV, cINV. bwsim(cioaut, aioaut, t, cINV, aINV)), subst:[cioaut, aioaut] → [IOAut(cstart, cstep, cext), IOAut(astart, astep, aext)]; ['ca, 'cs, 'aa, 'as, 'e] → ['ca, 'cs, 'aa, 'as, 'e], <all paths>

Additional information

Used terms: IOAut(cstart, cstep, cext), IOAut(astart, astep, aext)

Proof step 7 from proof bwsiminv-implies-weakbwsim (previous step) (back to tree)

⊦ ≤BI(cioaut, aioaut) ↔ (∃ t, aINV, cINV. bwsim(cioaut, aioaut, t, cINV, aINV))

Lemma backwardsiminv-def

Proof step 8 from proof bwsiminv-implies-weakbwsim (previous step) (back to tree)

¬ ≤wB(IOAut(cstart, cstep, cext), IOAut(astart, astep, aext)), ∃ t, aINV, cINV. bwsim(IOAut(cstart, cstep, cext), IOAut(astart, astep, aext), t, cINV, aINV) ⊦

Heuristic simplifier applied rule simplifier

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

Additional information

Proof step 9 from proof bwsiminv-implies-weakbwsim (previous step) (back to tree)

bwsim(IOAut(cstart, cstep, cext), IOAut(astart, astep, aext), t, cINV, aINV), ¬ ≤wB(IOAut(cstart, cstep, cext), IOAut(astart, astep, aext)) ⊦

User applied rule apply rewrite lemma

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

spec: <toplevel>, name: weakbackwardsim-def, seq: ⊦ ≤wB(cioaut, aioaut) ↔ (∃ t, aINV. weakbwsim(cioaut, aioaut, t, aINV)), subst:[cioaut, aioaut] → [IOAut(cstart, cstep, cext), IOAut(astart, astep, aext)]; ['ca, 'cs, 'aa, 'as, 'e] → ['ca, 'cs, 'aa, 'as, 'e], <all paths>

Additional information

Used terms: IOAut(cstart, cstep, cext), IOAut(astart, astep, aext)

Proof step 10 from proof bwsiminv-implies-weakbwsim (previous step) (back to tree)

⊦ ≤wB(cioaut, aioaut) ↔ (∃ t, aINV. weakbwsim(cioaut, aioaut, t, aINV))

Lemma weakbackwardsim-def

Proof step 11 from proof bwsiminv-implies-weakbwsim (previous step) (back to tree)

bwsim(IOAut(cstart, cstep, cext), IOAut(astart, astep, aext), t, cINV, aINV), ∀ t, aINV. ¬ weakbwsim(IOAut(cstart, cstep, cext), IOAut(astart, astep, aext), t, aINV) ⊦

User applied rule apply lemma

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

spec: <toplevel>, name:bwsiminv-implies-weakbwsim-aux, seq:bwsim(IOAut(cstart, cstep, cext), IOAut(astart, astep, aext), t, cINV, aINV) ⊦ weakbwsim(IOAut(cstart, cstep, cext), IOAut(astart, astep, aext), t, aINV), subst:[cstep, astep, aext, t, cext, aINV, cINV, astart, cstart] → [cstep, astep, aext, t, cext, aINV, cINV, astart, cstart]; ['ca, 'cs, 'aa, 'as, 'e] → ['ca, 'cs, 'aa, 'as, 'e]

Additional information

Used terms: cstep, cext, aext, t, astart, cstart, cINV, astep, aINV

Proof step 12 from proof bwsiminv-implies-weakbwsim (previous step) (back to tree)

bwsim(IOAut(cstart, cstep, cext), IOAut(astart, astep, aext), t, cINV, aINV) ⊦ weakbwsim(IOAut(cstart, cstep, cext), IOAut(astart, astep, aext), t, aINV)

Lemma bwsiminv-implies-weakbwsim-aux

Proof step 13 from proof bwsiminv-implies-weakbwsim (previous step) (back to tree)

bwsim(IOAut(cstart, cstep, cext), IOAut(astart, astep, aext), t, cINV, aINV), weakbwsim(IOAut(cstart, cstep, cext), IOAut(astart, astep, aext), t, aINV), ∀ t, aINV. ¬ weakbwsim(IOAut(cstart, cstep, cext), IOAut(astart, astep, aext), t, aINV) ⊦

Heuristic quantifier closing applied rule all left

And closed the goal!

Rule argument

pos: left 3 terms: t, aINV

Additional information

Used terms: t, aINV

Proof Tree for bwsiminv-implies-weakbwsim (View conclusion)

The following image shows the proof tree of sequent calculus. The proved goal is at the bottom. You can click on the nodes to view additional rules. See here for details on colors in a proof tree.

the proof tree