[Imprint]
[Data Privacy Statement]
[E-Mail]
View
long theorem info
. View
the proof
. Back to
main index
. View
the specification
. View
theorem base summary
, View
theorem base listing
, the
used properties by spec
, the
dependency list
, the
symbol table
,
Theorem isPersistFO-rec
⊦ isPersistFO(n + 1, fow ' + fowl) ↔ isPersistFO(n, fowl) ∧ fow.FO? ∧ fowl[n].tid ≠ fow.tid
Type: A user defined theorem
Validity: The proof is valid.
Features: s, ls,
Comment:
Used by:
Used by units in proved state:
abs-FLIT-FLITPSCweak
,
abs-FLITPSCweak-PLIB
,
Proof exists?: Yes
View
the proof
Infos about the proof
Proved?: Yes
Interactions: 5
Proof steps: 17
Used lemmas:
isPersistFO
,
Used spec theorems:
Used simplifier rules:
list-data
/
l
nat-basic
/
f
list
/
a
nat-basic
/
c
nat-basic
/
a
list-del
/
get-succ
nat-basic
/
s-04
nat-basic
/
l
nat-basic
/
succ
list
/
len-05
FOW
/
elim-FO
FOW
/
test-dotFOque-FO
nat-basic
/
trans-Nat
nat-basic
/
lf
list-del
/
get-zero
nat-basic
/
less-zero
nat
/
fle-01
nat
/
lels
nat
/
lez
nat-basic
/
zero
FOW
/
sel-FO-dottid
nat
/
succ-01