[Imprint]
[Data Privacy Statement]
[E-Mail]
View
long theorem info
. View
the proof
. Back to
main index
. View
the specification
. View
theorem base summary
, View
theorem base listing
, the
used properties by spec
, the
dependency list
, the
symbol table
,
Theorem one-pending-del-persist-FO-no-pending
⊦ onePendingW(t, l, p) ∧ FOFollowsW(t, p(l)) ∧ isPersistFO(n, p(l)) ∧ ¬ FO(t) ∈ p(l) -p n ∧ FO(t) ∈ p(l) → noPendingW(t, p)
Type: A user defined theorem
Validity: The proof is valid.
Features: ss, lss,
Comment:
Used by:
Used by units in proved state:
abs-FLITPSCweak-PLIB
,
Proof exists?: Yes
View
the proof
Infos about the proof
Proved?: Yes
Interactions: 11
Proof steps: 26
Used lemmas:
isPersistFO
,
Used spec theorems:
FLITPSC-preds
/
noPendingW
FLITPSC-preds
/
onePendingW
list
/
some-element
list-del
/
in-get
FLITPSC-preds
/
FOFollowsW-def
Used simplifier rules:
FOW
/
sel-FO-dottid
FOW
/
test-dotFOque-FO
list-data
/
l
list-del
/
delpos-get-fw
nat-basic
/
f
FLITPSC-preds
/
in-filter-W
FLITPSC-preds
/
in-filter-t
FOW
/
elim-W
FOW
/
test-dotWque-W
nat-basic
/
succ
nat-basic
/
trans-Nat
nat-basic
/
lf
FOW
/
sel-W-dottid
nat-basic
/
c
nat-basic
/
a
list-del
/
rmpos-get
nat
/
ls
nat-basic
/
one-01
nat
/
le-def
list-del
/
rmpos-size
nat-basic
/
s-04
nat
/
ls-01
nat-basic
/
oz
nat-basic
/
l
nat-basic
/
ls-02
nat
/
lels
list-getput
/
get-zero-01
nat
/
l-num-06
nat
/
elim-pred-c
nat
/
anti
nat-basic
/
lf-02
nat
/
ler
FOW
/
disj-FO-W