A lemma (entry) may depend on lemmas (entries) below its position, but never on lemmas above its position. This means the list is a topological order of the dependency graph. An entry 'all subs proved' means that all used lemmas are (transitively) proved.
| Name: | Status: | Subs proved? | Used: |
|---|---|---|---|
| exec-assign-wp | proved | all subs proved | free-unknown, eq, |
| free-unknown | proved | all subs proved | eq, free-notin, |
| assigned-known-getothermaplet | proved | all subs proved | assigned-known-getother, eq, |
| free-known | proved | all subs proved | eq, free-notin, |
| free-notin | proved | all subs proved | eq, |
| assigned-known-getother | proved | all subs proved | eq, |
| eq-cong-injl | proved | all subs proved | eq, |
| assign-unknown-weak | proved | all subs proved | eq, |
| in-assign | proved | all subs proved | eq, |
| eq-cong-injr | proved | all subs proved | eq, |
| collapse-assigns | proved | all subs proved | eq, |
| get-assign | proved | all subs proved | eq, |
| in-add | proved | all subs proved | eq, |
| assign-known-weak | proved | all subs proved | eq, |
| eq-at | proved | all subs proved | eq, |
| assign-new-other | proved | all subs proved | eq, |
| in-remove | proved | all subs proved | eq, |
| assign-wp | proved | all subs proved | eq, |
| eq-other | proved | all subs proved | eq, |
| assigned-known-getother2 | proved | all subs proved | eq, |
| eq-same | proved | all subs proved | eq, |
| eq | axiom |