[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]
View long theorem info.
View the proof.
Back to main index.
View the specification.
View theorem base summary,
View theorem base listing,
the used properties by spec,
the dependency list,
the symbol table,
Proof step 1 from proof empty-append (conclusion)
(back to tree)
System applied rule normalize
And obtained the following new goals
Rule argument
Additional information
User applied rule structural induction
And obtained the following new goals
Rule argument
indvar: σ
Additional information
Used simplifier rules:
stream freely generated by ⌜ ⌝, ⌜ ⌝;;
User applied rule apply rewrite lemma
And obtained the following new goals
Rule argument
spec: <toplevel>, name:empty, seq: ⊦ ⌜[]⌝ = [], subst:,
<rotated> <all paths>
Additional information
Used terms:
User applied rule apply rewrite lemma
And obtained the following new goals
Rule argument
spec: <toplevel>, name:append-finfin, seq: ⊦ ⌜x + y⌝ = ⌜x⌝ + ⌜y⌝ ,
subst:[y, x] → [x, []], <rotated> <all paths>
Additional information
Used simplifier rules:
⊦ [] + x = x; (s)
a: ⊦ (x + y) + z = x + y + z; from specification list
⊦ ⌜x⌝ = ⌜x0⌝ ↔ x = x0; (s)
Used terms: x, []
User applied rule apply rewrite lemma
And obtained the following new goals
Rule argument
spec: <toplevel>, name:empty, seq: ⊦ ⌜[]⌝ = [], subst:,
<rotated> <all paths>
Additional information
Used terms:
User applied rule apply rewrite lemma
And obtained the following new goals
Rule argument
spec: <toplevel>, name:append-fininf,
seq: ⊦ ⌜x⌝ + ⌜nf⌝ = ⌜λ n. (n < # x ⊃ x[n];nf(n - # x))⌝ ,
subst:[nf, x] → [nf, []], <all paths>
Additional information
Used simplifier rules:
⊦ ¬ n < 0; (s)
⊦ # [] = 0; (s)
⊦ m - 0 = m; (s)
⊦ ⌜nf⌝ = ⌜nf0⌝ ↔ nf = nf0; (s)
Used terms: nf, []
| ⊦ ⌜x⌝ + ⌜nf⌝ = ⌜λ n. (n < # x ⊃ x[n];nf(n - # x))⌝ |
Proof Tree for empty-append
(View conclusion)
The following image shows the proof tree of sequent calculus. The
proved goal is at the bottom. You can click on the nodes to view
additional rules. See here for details on colors in a proof
tree.