[Imprint]
[Data Privacy Statement]
[E-Mail]
View
long theorem info
. View
the proof
. Back to
main index
. View
the specification
. View
theorem base summary
, View
theorem base listing
, the
used properties by spec
, the
dependency list
, the
symbol table
,
Theorem reorder-isPersistFO-exists
⊦ reorder(l, fowl, fowl0, rfo) ∧ fowl0 = FO(t) ' + fowl1 → (∃ n. isPersistFO(n, fowl) ∧ fowl[n] = FO(t))
Type: A user defined theorem
Validity: The proof is valid.
Features:
Comment:
Used by:
reorder-isPersistFO-exists-lifted
,
Used by units in proved state:
Proof exists?: Yes
View
the proof
Infos about the proof
Proved?: Yes
Interactions: 11
Proof steps: 22
Used lemmas:
reorder-rec-W
,
reorder-rec-FO
,
reorder-base
,
Used spec theorems:
FLITPSCweak-preds
/
isPersistFO
list
/
firstoc-rew
Used simplifier rules:
list
/
app-02
list
/
e
list
/
a
list
/
c
list
/
c-08
FOW
/
disj-FO-W
FOW
/
sel-FO-dottid
FLITPSC-preds
/
filter-t-one
FLITPSC-preds
/
filter-t-append
list
/
in-rec
list
/
in-append
list
/
in-14
FOW
/
inj-FO
list-del
/
get-zero
list
/
len-05
nat-basic
/
succ
nat-basic
/
zero
nat-basic
/
oz
nat-basic
/
a
nat-basic
/
c
FOW
/
test-dotFOque-FO
nat-basic
/
less-zero
list
/
inapp-02
list
/
in-empty
list
/
Nil
FLITPSC-preds
/
filter-tid-empty
FLITPSCweak-preds
/
isPersistFO-rec
list-del
/
get-succ